Diagnosis Peer-reviewed

Pooled data confirm the Gold Coast criteria catch more ALS cases, with less certain specificity

Study published
Added to this website

The Gold Coast criteria, proposed in 2020, simplified how neurologists confirm an ALS diagnosis. This analysis pooled the individual records of 3,007 people from five international studies to compare them with the older revised El Escorial and Awaji criteria.

The Gold Coast criteria correctly identified 96% of people who had ALS, compared with 87% for each of the older sets. Specificity, meaning how well they rule out people who do not have ALS, was 68%, slightly lower than the older criteria (72–73%), and the evidence on specificity was rated very low certainty.

The authors suggest the criteria can support earlier diagnosis in specialist settings, alongside careful exclusion of conditions that mimic ALS and repeat assessment over time.

What this does not show

Only five studies contributed data, and the specificity estimates were imprecise and varied between studies.

Source

Gold Coast criteria for ALS diagnosis: individual participant data meta-analysis

Authors
Shrestha N, Munn Z, Calma A, et al.
Journal / organisation
Journal of Neurology
Published
19 August 2026
Study type
Individual participant data meta-analysis (5 studies)
Population
3,007 people assessed for suspected ALS
Peer reviewed
Yes
Free full text
PMC13489995

Read the original research (opens in a new tab)

This summary explains a single study. It is not medical advice and does not say what applies to any one person. Talk to your ALS care team before making decisions about treatment or trials.